Re:War Thunder user leaks restricted military documents for ...
by labster on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @05:54PM
(#37681884)
It has been [ 0 ] days since the last classified document leak on the War Thunder forums.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:War Thunder user leaks restricted military documents for ...
by capableweb on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @06:05PM
(#37682021)
Third time this month, so yeah almost.
Re:War Thunder user leaks restricted military documents for ...
by oittaa on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @06:26PM
(#37682267)
I wouldn't be surprised if someone posted detailed blueprints of a modern thermonuclear weapon just to win an argument. :)
Re:War Thunder user leaks restricted military documents for ...
by jowea on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @08:56PM
(#37683787)
I heard that in the present day that is mostly irrelevant. The hard part is procuring adequate fissile material more than designing the bomb. Maybe an ICBM design would help North Korea?
Re:War Thunder user leaks restricted military documents for ...
by jdougan on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @09:44PM
(#37684144)
It seems like aspects of miniaturizing multi-stage fusion devices can still be difficult. Single stage unboosted fission devices should be be near trivial, so long as you have a source of fissile material (as you indicated).
The other secret-ish aspect is details of the safety features and permissive action links. I say -ish because at one point the US offered to give PAL technology to the Soviets.
Re:War Thunder user leaks restricted military documents for ...
by justsomehnguy on Thursday September 28, 2023 @06:40PM
(#37696862)
There is nothing interesting is the design itself, the hard part is how to produce some very intricate parts and materials.