Bitwig and Presonus launch open DAWproject format

Re:Bitwig and Presonus launch open DAWproject format by izenme on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @04:36PM (#37680939)

XML, why?

And... 99% of the issues will be around plug-in management.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bitwig and Presonus launch open DAWproject format by hellotheretoday on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @05:04PM (#37681280)

Probably a relic of the musicxml format which still holds some popularity in programs based around sheet music/western notation

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bitwig and Presonus launch open DAWproject format by follower on Thursday September 28, 2023 @02:58AM (#37686268)

On the subject of MusicXML, there is currently ongoing work to develop a successor (currently named MNX): https://w3c.github.io/mnx/docs/

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bitwig and Presonus launch open DAWproject format by brtkdotse on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @05:30PM (#37681619)

XML is fine. Schema validation is really handy more often than you’d think.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bitwig and Presonus launch open DAWproject format by speedgoose on Thursday September 28, 2023 @12:48AM (#37685352)

You can do schema validation with other formats too.

For example you have JSON Schema, that many people experience through Kubernetes.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bitwig and Presonus launch open DAWproject format by anigbrowl on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @05:42PM (#37681753)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bitwig and Presonus launch open DAWproject format by phero_cnstrcts on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @05:54PM (#37681879)

What would you propose? Json?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bitwig and Presonus launch open DAWproject format by steve1977 on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @06:53PM (#37682547)

Why not?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bitwig and Presonus launch open DAWproject format by rebolek on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @07:10PM (#37682739)

easy to parse, supported by basically anything and not a shitty format like YAML for example

[ Parent | on HN ]