Re:I got robbed of my first kernel contribution
by caconym_ on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @01:13PM
(#37677822)
> the "everyone can be a valued contributor" crowd
Of course! Who will keep the hordes of dimwits and dilettantes and LinkedIn jockeys at bay, if not those whose merit has already been proven?
Re:I got robbed of my first kernel contribution
by fsdjkflsjfsoij on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @01:21PM
(#37677944)
> Who will keep the hordes of dimwits and dilettantes and LinkedIn jockeys at bay
This is unironically a very serious problem and why most of the best open source projects are basically corporate FAANG projects that are really only open source for optics.
Re:I got robbed of my first kernel contribution
by caconym_ on Wednesday September 27, 2023 @01:22PM
(#37677966)
On its face, you won't catch me arguing with that. It's a hard problem, for sure.
Re:I got robbed of my first kernel contribution
by ariel-miculas on Thursday September 28, 2023 @01:37PM
(#37692946)
Most of the people commenting in this thread haven't looked at the code and anyone saying the two patches are equivalent can be safely ignored. Out of the issues kazinator pointed out, 1 and 2 are definitely major issues and 3 is debatable although it is definitely suboptimal.
> some of those consequences may be deleterious to a project's health
Of course, but I think it might not be in the way the "everyone can be a valued contributor" crowd thinks.