News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Saint Helena Island Communications by lxgr on Monday September 25, 2023 @01:52PM (#37647885)
> Breaking existing rules and being unregulatable is probably an intentional point of Starlink.

Looking at Starlink's coverage map (for stationary service at least), they seem to very much be playing by the rules (i.e. international laws and regulations regarding satellite communication services): https://www.starlink.com/map

A "break rules and become unregulateable" approach would not have service boundaries corresponding to political borders.

Re:Saint Helena Island Communications by inemesitaffia on Tuesday September 26, 2023 @02:15AM (#37655111)
The map is not the territory.
Re:Saint Helena Island Communications by mcv on Tuesday September 26, 2023 @04:45AM (#37656301)
Don't these sats orbit the entire Earth? How is it possible there's anywhere on the planet (except maybe the poles) that they don't cover? Especially the eastern half of the US is particularly puzzling on that map.
Re:Saint Helena Island Communications by lxgr on Tuesday September 26, 2023 @07:42AM (#37657836)
Satellite-to-satellite forwarding is still being rolled out with Starlink, and without that, every satellite needs to have a ground station within its view to work.

The initial constellation also lacked polar orbits, which limits the maximum latitude at which satellites are available.

But both are being addressed now, and then it’s really only a question of regulatory approval.

Re:Saint Helena Island Communications by alwa on Tuesday September 26, 2023 @09:05AM (#37658699)
I was of the impression that the waitlist in the Eastern US was more a problem of saturated capacity than one of coverage.