Re:Working Remotely Can More Than Halve an Office Employee’s...
by temende on Friday September 22, 2023 @04:36PM
(#37617430)
My point is that there are many other, more fulfilling ways to get human company than forcing your co-workers to commute to the office everyday. Besides, for the many people who live with a family/kids/partner, WFH lets them spend even more time with them. The solution for people whose only source of social interaction is the office is to develop a social life outside of the office, not to force everyone else into RTO.
Re:Working Remotely Can More Than Halve an Office Employee’s...
by paulryanrogers on Friday September 22, 2023 @04:27PM
(#37617328)
Remote advocates by and large aren't arguing for abolition of offices. Only a choice.
And remote work can also be done from co-working spaces. Or with occasional all-hands IRL.
Re:Working Remotely Can More Than Halve an Office Employee’s...
by tmpX7dMeXU on Friday September 22, 2023 @07:51PM
(#37619253)
This is simply a non-starter. I have not witnessed a single work environment where long-term remote workers don’t effectively become second-class citizens against in-person workers on the same team, in a way that materially harms productivity.
Re:Working Remotely Can More Than Halve an Office Employee’s...
by jabradoodle on Saturday September 23, 2023 @09:43AM
(#37623148)
Are they perhaps subcontractors, or none of your management etc are remote too?
When there is a good mixture of everyone remote, I've found it not to be an issue.
Some people have convinced themselves that they don’t like social interaction, but this is probably due to a trained negative association caused by repeated past negative experiences. It seems very unlikely that some humans simply lack the social instinct congenitally.
Society is currently set up in a way that social urges are largely satisfied by work. Is that a good setup? No, it definitely isn’t. Is deleting it without a proven replacement a good idea? Also no.