News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Matrix 2.0: The Future of Matrix by Arathorn on Thursday September 21, 2023 @04:54PM (#37604178)
Low Bandwidth Matrix is the answer to that, and it’s currently on hold unless it gets funded: https://matrix.org/blog/2021/06/10/low-bandwidth-matrix-an-i...

It might also get changed as part of Sliding Sync refinement.

Re:Matrix 2.0: The Future of Matrix by xvilka on Thursday September 21, 2023 @09:38PM (#37606856)
Hopefully it will be the default once implemented. Everyone will benefit from compact protocol in the long run. Should have been done from the very beginning.
Re:Matrix 2.0: The Future of Matrix by snvzz on Friday September 22, 2023 @02:44AM (#37608691)
Is there going to be a way to have very simple clients, perhaps with a helper in the server side?

It'd be nice to bring matrix to microcontrollers and "retro" computer platforms.

Re:Matrix 2.0: The Future of Matrix by Arathorn on Friday September 22, 2023 @04:49AM (#37609594)
the API already is super simple, and low bandwidth could already work on retro machines (I had 6809 in mind when experimenting with it). The problem is e2ee, but we have the Pantalaimon e2ee proxy to convert unencrypted Matrix traffic into E2EE traffic for precisely this sort of thing :)
Re:Matrix 2.0: The Future of Matrix by snvzz on Friday September 22, 2023 @10:21AM (#37612426)
That's promising :)

I had 68000, 8086/88 and 6502 in mind.