News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Matrix 2.0: The Future of Matrix by mike-cardwell on Thursday September 21, 2023 @04:42PM (#37604015)
I just set it up. Wasn't that difficult:

1. Added a new postgres db and user 2. Added a new dns name 3. Added a new cert for the new dns name 4. Added a new vhost to nginx to proxy to a new port using the new dns name and cert 5. Added a simple docker-compose to my config 6. Added a snippet to my .well-known/matrix/client

Don't imagine it will take much maintenance. Container will be updated along with the rest of my containers, and the existence of the service doesn't change anything for any existing clients that don't support sliding sync.

Re:Matrix 2.0: The Future of Matrix by Arathorn on Thursday September 21, 2023 @06:36PM (#37605407)
The most important thing is to keep it updated, as we're fairly rapidly iterating on it, and most of the Element X bugs we've seen have actually turned out to be a stale Sliding Sync proxy deployment. Glad it was fairly straightforward.
Re:Matrix 2.0: The Future of Matrix by daedric7 on Friday September 22, 2023 @02:33PM (#37615856)
Agree... i don't think there's a time i have "docker compose pull" and a new version hasn't come up.

The fact that this is independent of any server implementation (read Synapse) means you can release much more frequent.

Choosing to use a proxy here was the right decision.