US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in Software Products

Re:US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in So... by coliveira on Thursday September 21, 2023 @03:27PM (#37602859)

And this is how it should be. Vendors need to be responsible for what they deliver, if it is FOSS or not.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in So... by gilcot on Thursday September 21, 2023 @04:03PM (#37603454)

When you give a piece of cake, that doesn't make you a cake vendor, do you?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in So... by yawaramin on Friday September 22, 2023 @01:13AM (#37608152)

You misunderstood. In the scenario you replied to, you give a piece of cake, to someone who then sold it to someone else. They are the vendor, not you.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in So... by gilcot on Friday September 22, 2023 @11:56PM (#37620470)

So we agree :)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in So... by yawaramin on Saturday September 23, 2023 @01:10AM (#37620719)

That was a piece of cake.

[ Parent | on HN ]