News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Alameda lost tens of millions because of a fat fingering ... by Vecr on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @08:05PM (#37591678)
(Most) trading's not done on chain, it's settled later. Alameda could absolutely trade faster than that.
Re:Alameda lost tens of millions because of a fat fingering ... by 0cf8612b2e1e on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @08:10PM (#37591708)
Doesn’t that just mean the trading is done by a trusted third party? Fine until the third party goes belly up.
Re:Alameda lost tens of millions because of a fat fingering ... by vgatherps on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @09:13PM (#37592120)
This is how most asset trading works, but outside of crypto these third parties are actually trustworthy
Re:Alameda lost tens of millions because of a fat fingering ... by JumpCrisscross on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @10:13PM (#37592515)
> outside of crypto these third parties are actually trustworthy

With multiple layers of mutualised failsafes.

Re:Alameda lost tens of millions because of a fat fingering ... by vgatherps on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @10:35PM (#37592619)
Don't forget meaningful regulations and legal requirements placed upon these parties
Re:Alameda lost tens of millions because of a fat fingering ... by peyton on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @10:41PM (#37592648)
Well, one might argue they’re trusted to grift retail. The money firms make doesn’t come out of thin air. SEC is fairly toothless in this area.
Re:Alameda lost tens of millions because of a fat fingering ... by Scott_Sanderson on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @09:57PM (#37592398)
Yes, the exchanges are 3rd parties that could lose, and often do lose, the money
Re:Alameda lost tens of millions because of a fat fingering ... by HWR_14 on Thursday September 21, 2023 @12:22AM (#37593195)
I thought the (noncrypto) financial exchanges made a very small amount of money on every trade.