News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Framework – We are not sustainable by sidcool on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @02:19PM (#37587809)
The messaging seemed to indicate they are commercially not sustainable.
Re:Framework – We are not sustainable by 1MachineElf on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @02:47PM (#37588281)
I had the same initial reaction. Perhaps it was intentionally clickbaity?
Re:Framework – We are not sustainable by nrp on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @04:09PM (#37589453)
We didn’t intend for it to be clickbait. We launched a page for our customers and prospective customers to share how we think about environmental impact along with a life cycle analysis of Framework Laptop 13.
Re:Framework – We are not sustainable by 1MachineElf on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @04:16PM (#37589574)
It's awesome! I don't have a problem with the headline at all, and I appreciate Framework's work on environmental sustainability. Maybe I should have said it was a catchy headline instead of characterizing it as clickbaity.
Re:Framework – We are not sustainable by Fnoord on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @06:00PM (#37590770)
Did you have Fairphone in mind when you wrote the article? Cause you are two awesome companies who do a lot well, and nothings perfect.
Re:Framework – We are not sustainable by 10000truths on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @03:52PM (#37589194)
@dang, could you change the title to something like "We are not environmentally sustainable" to make it less clickbait-y?
Re:Framework – We are not sustainable by Racing0461 on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @10:49PM (#37592685)
No, given apple’s focus on sustainability in their September event, I think this plays directly into that.
Re:Framework – We are not sustainable by billybuckwheat on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @04:12PM (#37589514)
Funny that when I read the headline, the first thing I thought of was environmentally sustainable. The financial angle didn't occur to me at all ...
Re:Framework – We are not sustainable by december456 on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @04:17PM (#37589593)
Same. The diversity of HN, i suppose.
Re:Framework – We are not sustainable by moritzwarhier on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @05:15PM (#37590287)
Isn't the confusion caused by a larger point though?

Like, how many of the top 100 economically sustainable companies are environmentally sustainable?

I agree the title is kind of click-baity, but I fail to see how it would be misrepresenting anything.

It's just a clever play on the word "sustainable".

Re:Framework – We are not sustainable by JohnFen on Thursday September 21, 2023 @11:17AM (#37598924)
I don't think it's a play on words at all. It's a straightforward use.
Re:Framework – We are not sustainable by kaffeeringe on Thursday September 21, 2023 @10:44AM (#37598397)
"Sustainability" means that something is economically profitable, ecologically viable and socially just.

If you don't make money, it's not sustainable. If you use up ressources, it's not sustainable. If you exploit people, it's not sustainable.

Re:Framework – We are not sustainable by ColoursofOSINT on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @04:37PM (#37589825)
[delayed]
Re:Framework – We are not sustainable by lucb1e on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @08:12PM (#37591720)
Guess it says something that I did think of the environment first. (People around me say I care too much, and they may be right)
Re:Framework – We are not sustainable by JohnFen on Thursday September 21, 2023 @11:16AM (#37598904)
Me too. "Going out of business" didn't even hint at entering my mind.
Re:Framework – We are not sustainable by ChrisArchitect on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @04:59PM (#37590108)
Well they're going to get their clicks from that title......

FYI it's about e-waste

Re:Framework – We are not sustainable by RecycledEle on Thursday September 21, 2023 @07:04AM (#37595922)
Sustainable means you can do the same thing, the same way, for a long time.

Environmental issues do not prevent tech from being sustainable. A lack of parts makes tech unsustainable.

If Framework wants to be more sustainable, they need to adopt more standard parts (like COM Express modules) and get other companies to adopt their best modules.

This silliness where they bring out a new motherboard for every generation of CPU is ridiculous. (I'm calling you out, Intel!) There is no reason Intel and AMD can not each bring out a new socket every 3 years and keep it for 9 years so they have low-end (laptop,) mid-range (desktop,) and high-end (server) sockets.

The 120V power receptacle in the US is an example of sustainable technology. It has been with us as long as I've been alive, and it will be with us another 100 years.

I wish people would correctly define "sustainable."