News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on We have successfully completed our migration to RAM-only VPN infrastructure. Parent comment

Re:We have successfully completed our migration to RAM-only ... by jameskilton on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @09:40AM (#37583977)
I am not a lawyer, but my understanding is that this generally falls under Section 230, as you can make the same argument about Comcast, AT&T, et.al. who lets the bytes go over their infrastructure.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:We have successfully completed our migration to RAM-only ... by kwanbix on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @09:45AM (#37584034)
But the difference is that Comcast, AT&T, et.al can say, jameskilton was using this IP. The VPN is saying, I don't know.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:We have successfully completed our migration to RAM-only ... by nwellnhof on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @10:02AM (#37584252)
That's only a problem if the VPN is in a jurisdiction with data retention laws: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_retention
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:We have successfully completed our migration to RAM-only ... by hollander on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @12:25PM (#37586186)
What if you get the same IP time and again?
[ Parent | on HN ]