Re:Quantum Resistance and the Signal Protocol
by tptacek on Tuesday September 19, 2023 @03:29PM
(#37575133)
CRYSTALS-Kyber was designed by an academic team, not a government (though a government standards body refereed the competition that selected it; that competition, in turn, was driven by technical feedback that came predominantly from academic cryptography teams around the world). In general, with some exceptions (like curve isogenies), the "math" behind PQ crypto is pretty well established; it was just less attractive than curves were for performance reasons, but is now more attractive if you presume curves will be broken in 20 years by QC.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Quantum Resistance and the Signal Protocol
by pyinstallwoes on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @04:08AM
(#37581694)
Yet if you followed the money those programs are funded by government adjacent entities that usually have 3 letters.
Re:Quantum Resistance and the Signal Protocol
by tptacek on Wednesday September 20, 2023 @10:06AM
(#37584308)
None of those researchers have been subverted by academic grants.
Re:Quantum Resistance and the Signal Protocol
by pyinstallwoes on Saturday September 23, 2023 @01:42AM
(#37620853)
But those grants specifically influence that which is researched