You are talking about what ended up being implemented, the post talks about what musk wanted to do. Different things.

> what ended up being implemented

He's the CEO, what's implemented is what he wants to do.

He did what he wanted to do. Which was pitch, listen to feedback, and implement. Like a good CEO.

And then use it against the customers for malicious means. Like a good CEO.

> listen to feedback, and implement.

The whole X debacle has proven once again that Elon will never give up on a bad idea that he has tied his ego to or that was shut down by people he dislikes.

These are exactly the kind of idea that he will jump at once the opportunity arises and the pesky naysayers aren't in the room; "why should we have to bother with any of this privacy or informed consent stuff" is where he's coming from.

That is his style of CEOing, for better or worse.

This event is literally about how he listened to his people.

Probably shouldn't call it self driving when you its just a level 2 feature that requires full attention of the driver to use safely. See the confusion. When I think of self driving, i think of level 3 or higher standard where i can safely not pay attention to the road. I don't even think any of the other manufactures who have L3 cars on the market call it self driving.

You didn't respond to any of the GP's points, you made a semantics argument spinoff for one word.

Concerted effort to make propaganda against him seems a bit superflouous at this point.