Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI

Re:Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI by ThinkBeat on Saturday September 16, 2023 @07:22PM (#37539840)

I think users should be able to choose to "run locally" or "run in Adobe Cloud", with the understanding that running them locally could be slow

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI by AuryGlenz on Saturday September 16, 2023 @08:41PM (#37540349)

It wouldn’t just be slow, I’m guessing it wouldn’t run on everything but maybe GPUs with 24GB of VRAM. The newest version of Stable Diffusion is the same resolution and the only way they got it to work on 12GB cards was the split the model in two.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI by thenickdude on Saturday September 16, 2023 @09:24PM (#37540545)

SDXL runs fine on my 6GB card, and I hear people manage it on 4GB too.

Mine's only a 1060 though, so it does take minutes for a generation, whereas the newer cards can do it an order of magnitude faster.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI by AuryGlenz on Saturday September 16, 2023 @09:47PM (#37540682)

I'm sorry, I believe they said they split it for 8 GB cards. The point still remains that it's way faster than local generation.

Of course, I wouldn't mind it not using credits if I could use it locally either. Hopefully they continue to improve SD's IP Adapter type stuff so it's as good as Photoshop in that regard.

[ Parent | on HN ]