Re:Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI
by krasin on Saturday September 16, 2023 @06:55PM
(#37539637)
Collecting training data is actually a perfect for crowdsourcing. Images/videos are easier than text, and text is easier than high-quality text, but all are doable.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI
by vunderba on Saturday September 16, 2023 @07:00PM
(#37539664)
Only so far as you trust your crowd. It only takes one bad actor to poison an entire data set with a few pieces of copyrighted samples, and now the entire model is subject to potential future litigation.
Re:Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI
by krasin on Sunday September 17, 2023 @02:38AM
(#37542150)
Wikipedia somehow handles this okay. But yes, there will be work to do to address the issue.
Re:Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI
by octacat on Sunday September 17, 2023 @05:56PM
(#37549718)
How is it different from stock images? People could sell not their work on the stock sites, and it is pretty hard to detect.
Or impossible to detect, if you ask some AI model to repaint the image first, before putting it into the stock.
Re:Adobe will charge “credits” for generative AI
by heavyset_go on Saturday September 16, 2023 @10:57PM
(#37541071)
I feel like the amount of training data needed to compete with commercial models would require a large amount of automation to collect, and it's that same automated collection that platforms recently decided to gatekeep against.