Re:AI and the End of Programming
by hnaccountme on Thursday September 14, 2023 @12:55AM
(#37505129)
Anyone who thinks AI is actually intelligent is only Almost Intelligent
[ Parent
| on HN ]
It's a heck lot smarter than most humans I know
Re:AI and the End of Programming
by Turskarama on Thursday September 14, 2023 @07:48AM
(#37507664)
By what metric? Ability to write a regex does not appear on any IQ test I know of.
By the simple metric of being able to converse with them on various topics
Re:AI and the End of Programming
by continuitylimit on Thursday September 14, 2023 @10:00AM
(#37509162)
Intelligence is manifested by the quality and timeliness of decisions. Talking has always been a faux demonstration of actual intelligence, for man or machine.
Fooled me!
Very well said!
The big problem is going to be some "not so intelligent" Human making decisions based on AI/ML output without verification.
Re:AI and the End of Programming
by saltwatercowboy on Thursday September 14, 2023 @10:54PM
(#37517713)
That’s… not true. Action and speech aren’t at odds. They’re not even clearly delineated.
Where would basic planning fit here? Is it a “faux demonstration” (??) for engineers to talk through their ideas for approaching a problem before attempting it?
If IQ tests are your metric GPT-4 is already way above average.
Re:AI and the End of Programming
by notmypenguin on Friday September 15, 2023 @12:34AM
(#37518474)
It doesn’t reason, it isn’t intelligent. There are humans who avoid reasoning but the biological capacity for this is inbuilt.
An LLM is like asking Google to make a search results collage. It’s an entirely derivative essentializer