News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus. Parent comment

Re:iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus by taway32r41 on Tuesday September 12, 2023 @04:25PM (#37487694)
"Banks are not repaying customers who contest “unauthorized” Zelle payments – potentially violating federal law and CFPB rules."

I suppose you and Senator Warren have different definitions for unauthorized.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus by SamReidHughes on Tuesday September 12, 2023 @05:53PM (#37489041)
So, actually, 47% of them by dollar amount, according to the report you quoted. Selectively quoted. Why do you behave this way?

Here's a question for you to think about: Why do they reverse some claims but not others?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus by taway32r41 on Tuesday September 12, 2023 @10:12PM (#37491359)
> Why do they reverse some claims but not others?

I guess that is the question. I'll be interested in the bank's reply.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus by Dylan16807 on Tuesday September 12, 2023 @08:07PM (#37490429)
Why is the word "unauthorized" in scare quotes?

And a lot of the complaint is about "cases where customers reported being fraudulently induced into making payments", which would agree with the ancestor comment.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus by taway32r41 on Tuesday September 12, 2023 @10:08PM (#37491343)
Honestly I don't know. I copied and pasted the text and punctuation from the original document and it put them there. I also didn't do the research. The office of Senator Warren did. You can quibble with them. :)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus by Dylan16807 on Tuesday September 12, 2023 @10:29PM (#37491484)
> You can quibble with them. :)

The scare quotes imply that they are the ones saying the case isn't very strong, so I'm not quibbling with them, I'm trying to interpret them.

[ Parent | on HN ]