News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Physicists Observe ‘Unobservable’ Quantum Phase Transition. Parent comment

Re:Physicists Observe ‘Unobservable’ Quantum Phase Transition by kgwgk on Tuesday September 12, 2023 @07:13AM (#37479334)
Depends on the definition of “interaction”.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Physicists Observe ‘Unobservable’ Quantum Phase Transition by bowsamic on Tuesday September 12, 2023 @07:17AM (#37479373)
Two systems affecting each other
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Physicists Observe ‘Unobservable’ Quantum Phase Transition by kgwgk on Tuesday September 12, 2023 @07:19AM (#37479400)
Then the non-locality of entanglement doesn’t get you that because it concerns a single system.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Physicists Observe ‘Unobservable’ Quantum Phase Transition by bowsamic on Tuesday September 12, 2023 @07:24AM (#37479438)
Even so, we still call it interaction. And it still raises questions about quantum gravity.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Physicists Observe ‘Unobservable’ Quantum Phase Transition by kgwgk on Tuesday September 12, 2023 @07:32AM (#37479485)
So much for your own definition of “interaction”…
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Physicists Observe ‘Unobservable’ Quantum Phase Transition by bowsamic on Tuesday September 12, 2023 @07:36AM (#37479516)
Why are you being rude to me?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Physicists Observe ‘Unobservable’ Quantum Phase Transition by kgwgk on Tuesday September 12, 2023 @07:56AM (#37479697)
That was not my intention.

If there is a non-rude way of conveying the message “when I said that it depends on the definition of interaction you gave me one and then you told me to ignore it” please assume that I had written that instead.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Physicists Observe ‘Unobservable’ Quantum Phase Transition by anotheraccount9 on Tuesday September 12, 2023 @07:47AM (#37479612)
I see what you did there
[ Parent | on HN ]