Re:Lithium discovery in US volcano could be biggest deposit ...
by _hypx on Monday September 11, 2023 @04:43AM
(#37464536)
Anything that works like existing rechargeable batteries. Those would be considered conventional batteries. There is basically no path to a high enough energy density for airplanes for those types of batteries.
Things that involve metal-air reactions are basically fuel cells and don't count. If you go down that route, you'll quickly find yourself working with some kind of chemical fuel. They will suddenly look a lot like existing airplanes in terms of basic concept.
Re:Lithium discovery in US volcano could be biggest deposit ...
by eru on Monday September 11, 2023 @07:23AM
(#37465622)
> Anything that works like existing rechargeable batteries. Those would be considered conventional batteries.
Ok, that definition works.
I would have gone with 'whatever people (in the future or now) use for powering their phones, laptops and electric cars' is by definition 'conventional' at that point in time.
I made the original comment contemporary batteries ain't good for electric planes. And I would not bet on batteries becoming good enough anytime soon.
But I don't think physics prohibits anything here?