Sucking carbon dioxide out of the sky is moving from science fiction to reality

Re:Sucking carbon dioxide out of the sky is moving from scie... by blueflow on Sunday September 10, 2023 @04:42AM (#37454033)

I think the two thirds of the worlds population that are too poor for plane tickets would prefer banning flights.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sucking carbon dioxide out of the sky is moving from scie... by david-gpu on Sunday September 10, 2023 @04:47AM (#37454060)

People are not the only thing that travels by air.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sucking carbon dioxide out of the sky is moving from scie... by blueflow on Sunday September 10, 2023 @07:29AM (#37454849)

How much % of the worlds population are financially able to afford international shipping?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sucking carbon dioxide out of the sky is moving from scie... by petesergeant on Sunday September 10, 2023 @09:16AM (#37455549)

> How much % of the worlds population are financially able to afford international shipping?

Another way of looking at that is: what percentage of the world regularly consumes products that went from one country to another by plane and I think it's probably reasonably high?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sucking carbon dioxide out of the sky is moving from scie... by rtz121 on Sunday September 10, 2023 @04:54AM (#37454108)

Any why does their opinion matter?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sucking carbon dioxide out of the sky is moving from scie... by quickthrower2 on Sunday September 10, 2023 @05:45AM (#37454334)

With world citizen hat on I prefer to have a carbon neutral flight infra than no flight infra.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sucking carbon dioxide out of the sky is moving from scie... by Aerroon on Sunday September 10, 2023 @08:33AM (#37455266)

China went from poor to being pretty well off in a few decades. We should assume that poor countries won't stay poor and that they will work towards our levels of quality of life.

[ Parent | on HN ]