[dead]
Re:Appeals Court Rules White House Overstepped First Amendme...
by tourmalinetaco on Saturday September 09, 2023 @10:06AM
(#37445605)
You are disgusting in every sense of the word.
Re:Appeals Court Rules White House Overstepped First Amendme...
by dang on Monday September 11, 2023 @07:03PM
(#37474875)
You've broken the site guidelines egregiously here and elsewhere (e.g. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37446036, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36696864). We have to ban accounts that post like that, so please don't post like that again, no matter how wrong someone else is or you feel they are.
If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.
Re:Appeals Court Rules White House Overstepped First Amendme...
by anon291 on Saturday September 09, 2023 @09:59AM
(#37445501)
> So does your understanding of the first amendment allow about passing a photo of a child being raped?
No... You know it doesn't and you also know that this kind of speech is nothing like the speech that was directly prevented here by the government, so let's stop playing games.
Re:Appeals Court Rules White House Overstepped First Amendme...
by cowpig on Saturday September 09, 2023 @10:18AM
(#37445729)
I'm trying to establish some basic understanding of our laws here. There are no absolutes, lines have to be drawn somewhere. And in the case of encouraging people to spread diseases to kill other people, seems obvious a line should be drawn. IMO it's as serious as any of the things I mentioned.
Re:Appeals Court Rules White House Overstepped First Amendme...
by dang on Monday September 11, 2023 @06:08PM
(#37474364)
Would you please stop perpetuating flamewars on HN? You started and fueled a doozy in this thread. We're trying for exactly the opposite here, so please don't.
If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.