Re:Labeling Beef ‘Low Carbon’ Could Open Premium Market for ...
by taway1237 on Friday September 08, 2023 @10:35AM
(#37434040)
Yeah, it reads backwards. 2.4% of total greenhouse emissions just for one kind of food item sounds huge.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Labeling Beef ‘Low Carbon’ Could Open Premium Market for ...
by delecti on Friday September 08, 2023 @11:14AM
(#37434593)
And just one kind of food from a single country which is only 4.2% of the world's population. That makes beef more than 50% of our "fair share" of emissions.
Re:Labeling Beef ‘Low Carbon’ Could Open Premium Market for ...
by jononomo on Friday September 08, 2023 @11:41AM
(#37435082)
Isn't it incredible that if we all stopped eating beef then this would have a larger impact on global warming than if we rolled back to a preindustrial age and got rid of trains, airplanes, automobiles, and the construction industry?
Re:Labeling Beef ‘Low Carbon’ Could Open Premium Market for ...
by fieldcny on Friday September 08, 2023 @12:40PM
(#37435961)
How do you figure?
Re:Labeling Beef ‘Low Carbon’ Could Open Premium Market for ...
by vlovich123 on Friday September 08, 2023 @11:25AM
(#37434804)
The wording is vague. It’s also possible read as 2.4% of total US emissions, not worldwide. Looking up other sources, it does seem to be 2-3% of total US emissions, not worldwide.