News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pentagon: Trillion-Dollar Jet on Brink of Budgetary Disaster by redsymbol on Thursday March 22, 2012 @01:15PM (#3740796)
The reference to one trillion dollars in the headline is accurate, but lacks context that makes it a bit sensationalist. The article elaborates the cost as "an estimated $1 trillion to develop, purchase and support through 2050". Or about $25 billion a year. Whether that's pricey or a bargain depends on how many aircraft are purchased and supported; TFA states that the "Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps are counting on buying as many as 2,500 F-35s", which would be $10 million per craft per year for the next four decades.

This is not to say the thing isn't an overpriced, failing project. If the GAO's analysis and predictions cited in the article are correct, it sounds pretty bad. In particular, it's hard to imagine that four decades from now, the US armed forces would want to still be using early 21st-century aircraft.

Re:Pentagon: Trillion-Dollar Jet on Brink of Budgetary Disaster by olalonde on Thursday March 22, 2012 @01:59PM (#3741081)
You are omitting the time value of money which can make a huge difference in such a large time frame. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_value_of_money