Re:Ask HN: I’m an FCC Commissioner proposing regulation of I...
by theptip on Tuesday September 05, 2023 @02:19PM
(#37395688)
I think the way to make this proposal work is to pass legislation to actually have meaningful financial liability for data breaches.
IFF companies have financial liability, then the market can be expected to find a cost-effective solution.
Without any selection pressure though, there is no reason tho think the market will spend resources to solve this. Users empirically don’t understand security, don’t price it appropriately in advance, and aren’t able to evaluate the security qualities even if they do want to pay more for a “secure” product.
Re:Ask HN: I’m an FCC Commissioner proposing regulation of I...
by CodeWriter23 on Tuesday September 05, 2023 @02:01PM
(#37395446)
You can't see the consumer benefitting from a certification label? Interesting. Also, the vendor benefits by gaining more sales.
Re:Ask HN: I’m an FCC Commissioner proposing regulation of I...
by agloe_dreams on Tuesday September 05, 2023 @02:19PM
(#37395693)
I'm not sure you are following them. The UL was funded by the Insurance companies. Their point was that there was some organized, rich entity to pay for the costs of operation as they had a financial stake.
Re:Ask HN: I’m an FCC Commissioner proposing regulation of I...
by pbronez on Tuesday September 05, 2023 @04:01PM
(#37396986)
Yes, the consumer would benefit. But Consumers are not a concrete interest group like “property insurers”. They lack the concentration of economic power need to cover the costs.
I don't see any particular entity benefiting from security labels - it's a problem of the "commons" where you generally need government intervention of some sort of.