News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The History of Windows 95 by biogene on Monday September 04, 2023 @12:27PM (#37382012)
You mean its based on a massively successful operating system that was used by millions?
Re:The History of Windows 95 by HeckFeck on Tuesday September 05, 2023 @06:11AM (#37389877)
Nothing wrong with DOS (and I mean that sincerely), just Windows 9x was much more than it.
Re:The History of Windows 95 by biogene on Tuesday September 05, 2023 @04:09PM (#37397058)
No worries, I got the point you were trying to make, my comment was directed more at people who snipe at successful products - when the reality is a lot more nuanced/complicated. There is complete freedom to criticize, but then (I believe) there is also a responsibility to contextualize the criticism.
Re:The History of Windows 95 by edizms on Tuesday September 05, 2023 @10:00AM (#37391732)
You had to be around to understand the sentiment behind the "DOS based" issue. It's what many non PC users said about windows when discussing its instability and use of legacy code.
Re:The History of Windows 95 by biogene on Tuesday September 05, 2023 @04:05PM (#37397021)
I didn't find DOS or Windows to be any less stable than other consumer operating systems. But regardless of which code-base is more/less stable, niche code-bases don't get stressed in the same way as a mainstream consumer OS.