Re:Jitsi Meet Abandons Anonimity Promise
by ComputerGuru on Monday September 04, 2023 @12:17PM
(#37381903)
I personally think it was likely/almost certainly the case. That doesn’t change the fact that without sufficient actual evidence it remains “allegedly.”
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Jitsi Meet Abandons Anonimity Promise
by zozbot234 on Monday September 04, 2023 @12:30PM
(#37382044)
Well, the announcement talks about clear-cut ToS violations. Maybe it was about illegally streamed soccer matches - that's a bit of a plague as of late.
Re:Jitsi Meet Abandons Anonimity Promise
by lnxg33k1 on Monday September 04, 2023 @12:36PM
(#37382101)
Piracy is still the best way/our best chance to get rid of soccer and all the nothingness that it involves in terms of drama, gossip, etc
I mean, it could also be beheadings, revenge porn, doxxing, etc. Lots of clear-cut violations that are more serious than illegally streamed soccer matches.
But the true answer is probably "all of the above".
Re:Jitsi Meet Abandons Anonimity Promise
by pengaru on Monday September 04, 2023 @02:18PM
(#37383290)
Not all porn is CSAM... Are we just assuming it's CSAM because non-CSAM would be on OnlyFans? Is there not an appeal for the anonymity and zero-cost Jitsi offered over OF-like services, for consenting adults?
I've never used OF but assumed they take a cut. Through Jitsi a performer could arrange for payment via crypto, protect their identity, and not pay a cut to any middle-men beyond the crypto fees. What am I missing?