Re:Vale.sh – A Linter for Prose
by starkparker on Sunday September 03, 2023 @07:50PM
(#37375768)
Ironically, perhaps, considering its popularity among technical writers, Vale's documentation is ambiguous in places and difficult to navigate.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Vale.sh – A Linter for Prose
by MilStdJunkie on Monday September 04, 2023 @12:02AM
(#37377012)
It's in keeping with traditional techpubs software being an unmitigated dumpster fire. :)
Not Vale, though. Vale's pretty slick; although personally I've always gravitated to RedPen.cc and LanguageTools[1] more than Vale. Grammarly, yes, Grammarly is also in this natlang linter space, but has possibly the least responsible data safety rules of any VSC extension I've ever seen. It's harsh, but I comprehensively advise customers away from Grammarly if they have any kind of data restriction at all.
[1] LT for no other reason than ASD STE-100 checking - it's old tech