Re:SF Fire Dept.: Person Dies After Cruise Robotaxi Blocked ...
by notatoad on Sunday September 03, 2023 @01:05PM
(#37372010)
if you have video of somebody being put on a stretcher before they died, it's best not to share that too widely. for legal reasons as well as just general humanity.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SF Fire Dept.: Person Dies After Cruise Robotaxi Blocked ...
by bink on Sunday September 03, 2023 @01:13PM
(#37372078)
They don't need to publish it on a website. They could release it to the local news orgs that handle this type of video daily. It's not hard to blur things that would be offensive.
Re:SF Fire Dept.: Person Dies After Cruise Robotaxi Blocked ...
by minwcnt5 on Sunday September 03, 2023 @02:01PM
(#37372596)
Isn't that exactly what they've done? Forbes, NBC, KRON4, SFStandard, and probably other news orgs have all reviewed the video.
Re:SF Fire Dept.: Person Dies After Cruise Robotaxi Blocked ...
by bink on Sunday September 03, 2023 @06:34PM
(#37375243)
I'm not sure how many orgs have seen it. I've heard of two and we don't have any way of knowing if they saw an edited or full copy and from all available angles. They apparently haven't been allowed to make a copy of it and broadcast it so we can make up our own minds.
Re:SF Fire Dept.: Person Dies After Cruise Robotaxi Blocked ...
by sdflhasjd on Sunday September 03, 2023 @01:14PM
(#37372083)
From the article, it implies the patient wasn't recorded on video.
> The video, which Cruise declined to share publicly [...] does not capture the patient being loaded onto the ambulance.