Re:Police Seized Innocent Peoples Property, Kept It for Year...
by cdchn on Friday September 01, 2023 @02:50PM
(#37354734)
Here's even more absurd: United States v. Forty Barrels and Twenty Kegs of Coca-Cola
A federal suit under which the government unsuccessfully attempted to force the Coca-Cola Company to remove caffeine from its product.
Re:Police Seized Innocent Peoples Property, Kept It for Year...
by danbruc on Friday September 01, 2023 @02:50PM
(#37354743)
I remember some discussion here quite some time ago where somebody brought this up and linked to a list of the strangest cases, I still remember something like United States vs. a few tons of fish.
Re:Police Seized Innocent Peoples Property, Kept It for Year...
by cdchn on Friday September 01, 2023 @02:51PM
(#37354755)
Wikipedia's list of "in rem" cases has a lot of them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:United_States_in_rem_...
Re:Police Seized Innocent Peoples Property, Kept It for Year...
by danbruc on Friday September 01, 2023 @02:53PM
(#37354783)
There it is. Seemingly it was not against complete fish.
United States v. Approximately 64,695 Pounds of Shark Fins [1]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Approximately...
Re:Police Seized Innocent Peoples Property, Kept It for Year...
by cdchn on Friday September 01, 2023 @03:38PM
(#37355298)
I see one case against complete animals in US vs. 15 Impounded Cats.
Re:Police Seized Innocent Peoples Property, Kept It for Year...
by tempodox on Friday September 01, 2023 @04:13PM
(#37355685)
In the middle ages they had a lawsuit against the woodworms that ate a pulpit because a preacher fell when it eventually broke down, but one can always optimize for more absurdity.
Re:Police Seized Innocent Peoples Property, Kept It for Year...
by winrid on Friday September 01, 2023 @04:22PM
(#37355774)
United States v. One Solid Gold Object in Form of a Rooster
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._One_Solid_G...
They arrest your money. You are not accused of a crime, your money is. Your money is not a person, and thus has no constitutional rights. Your money is not innocent until proven, that's a silly system reserved for persons - instead, your money must prove its innocence. And thus you get cases with absurd titles such as "United States v. $84,740.00 U.S. Currency" ( https://casetext.com/case/us-v-8474000-us-currency )
I'd love to say you can't make this up, but they did.