News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Teaching with AI by qwerty456127 on Friday September 01, 2023 @03:26AM (#37347778)
> The main issue that is not addressed is that students need points to pass their subjects and get a high school diploma.

This is a solution (evidently imperfect and arguably obsolete) the education system uses to address the problem of proving the fact a student has gained desirable knowedge and experience. It can and should be deprecated altogether once we come up with a better solution to this. And we certainly can. For example, we can invent ana AI which would interview a student/candidate a way, proven (by numerous comparisions to their actual performance measured with other methods) to estimate their level of expertise and capability with sufficient degree of precision.

In case such a new way proves reliable and efficient we can even decouple expertise measurement and actual education on a mass scale then - let people gain knowledge whatever an alternative way they want and can, then just come and pass the test to receive an accredited degree. This way we can automate production of unlimited stream of certified experts.

Re:Teaching with AI by michaelt on Friday September 01, 2023 @03:36AM (#37347832)
I'm not saying it's a good or bad idea - but the idea of a future where an interview with a computer judges people's ability and decides whether they get to go to college or not sounds like something from Futurama.
Re:Teaching with AI by qwerty456127 on Friday September 01, 2023 @03:40AM (#37347861)
I can see no problem here if it is objectively proven to be capable of confirming whether a candidate is an expert. Unless you artificialy set a rule that candidates can only apply once.
Re:Teaching with AI by theprivacydad on Tuesday September 05, 2023 @03:40PM (#37396725)
It's a good idea, but doesn't solve the problem of the student then using AI to answer the questions in the interview. We're back to square one.