Re:ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech – No Matter How Awfu...
by pseudo0 on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @07:59PM
(#37315839)
There was some good reporting on this issue in the Twitter Files. For example, Jim Baker, the general counsel at Twitter, used to work for the FBI. Musk fired Baker for his role in suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop story.
https://jonathanturley.org/2022/12/04/six-degrees-from-james...
Re:ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech – No Matter How Awfu...
by puglr on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @08:18PM
(#37315993)
Found the source[1]. It includes names and LinkedIn profiles, so ought to be verifiable.
[1] https://www.mintpressnews.com/twitter-hiring-alarming-number...
Re:ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech – No Matter How Awfu...
by autoexec on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @09:01PM
(#37316317)
That covers twitter, now what about every other social media network. The claim was that this was happening for all of them.
Re:ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech – No Matter How Awfu...
by puglr on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @09:38PM
(#37316603)
Oh sorry, you're right. Here's an article[1] about Facebook, from the same outlet. With some cursory searching I couldn't find anything about other social networks hiring former three letter agency employees.
[1] https://www.mintpressnews.com/meet-ex-cia-agents-deciding-fa...
Re:ISPs Should Not Police Online Speech – No Matter How Awfu...
by pseudo0 on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @09:56PM
(#37316717)
The same outlet also covered Google: https://www.mintpressnews.com/national-security-search-engin...
Here's another good source about Google's revolving door with government during the Obama administration: https://www.techtransparencyproject.org/articles/googles-rev...
Where can I find more about this?