Re:Scrum is a cancer
by red-iron-pine on Monday August 28, 2023 @09:37AM
(#37293753)
"don't hire a 10x team, learn to build a 10x team"
or something like that.
There’s a pretty big difference between carefully seeding up and coming talent and deliberately hiring 40 mids like some folks are suggesting here to build their scrum teams or whatever. There aint going to be no growth here.
Re:Scrum is a cancer
by theshrike79 on Monday August 28, 2023 @03:35PM
(#37299330)
If you can determine an "up and coming talent" from a "mid" during a 1 hour job interview, you really should start up a HR consulting company. =)
The only way to figure it out is to hire the ones that seem good and see who blossoms.
Yes which is why your strategy doesn't work unless you're also really good at firing people (which brings its own set of challenges).
Re:Scrum is a cancer
by theshrike79 on Tuesday August 29, 2023 @01:07AM
(#37303743)
Over here we have a 6 month probation, during which you can fire people American-style by just saying "GTFO" with no reason required. (You can give one, but it's an art to tell the correct one, the wrong reasons will get you in trouble)
Yes, there are some people who shape up for 6 months and then start slacking, but they're definitely not the norm. You should be able to evaluate a person in that time and see if their personality fits the team and whether they are a net positive for the productivity.
When you hire people straight off school or "mid tier" people, you can help them grow to be better and reap the benefits.
If everyone will just hire the "top tier talent", their prices will inflate and the pool of top tier people will never grow.