Re:Show HN: Graphweaver – Instant GraphQL API on Postgres, M...
by gedy on Sunday August 27, 2023 @01:03PM
(#37284512)
Nice, is this comparable to Hasura? What are some differences if so?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Graphweaver – Instant GraphQL API on Postgres, M...
by graphweaver on Sunday August 27, 2023 @05:06PM
(#37286644)
Yeah it is comparable:
- We are 100% open source. - Written in Typescript. - We support any data source directly in the server process, either with pre-built data providers or build your own. - We support cross data source filtering (get orders from database with CRM username)
Re:Show HN: Graphweaver – Instant GraphQL API on Postgres, M...
by cpursley on Sunday August 27, 2023 @08:10PM
(#37288019)
Backend being written in TS is a big downside vs. Hasura’s blazing fast Haskell backend.
Re:Show HN: Graphweaver – Instant GraphQL API on Postgres, M...
by gedy on Sunday August 27, 2023 @08:49PM
(#37288341)
True, but if it's open source, TS is probably a lot more practical for maintenance or contributions vs smaller pool of Haskell devs.
Re:Show HN: Graphweaver – Instant GraphQL API on Postgres, M...
by dventimi on Sunday August 27, 2023 @08:55PM
(#37288370)
Evidently, Hasura is migrating to Rust. That's pretty fast and seems to have a lot of developers.
https://discourse.haskell.org/t/hasura-migrating-to-rust/662...
Re:Show HN: Graphweaver – Instant GraphQL API on Postgres, M...
by graphweaver on Sunday August 27, 2023 @08:59PM
(#37288404)
Not everyone will see TS as an advantage but there are many who will.
Re:Show HN: Graphweaver – Instant GraphQL API on Postgres, M...
by gavinray on Sunday August 27, 2023 @10:09PM
(#37288845)
> We are 100% open source
I mean, so is Hasura. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine(Disclaimer: Work at Hasura)
Re:Show HN: Graphweaver – Instant GraphQL API on Postgres, M...
by graphweaver on Monday August 28, 2023 @07:11PM
(#37301517)
We appreciate all the hard work that Hasura has done to make GraphQL a main stream technology.