News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:E-ink is so Retropunk by MayeulC on Saturday August 26, 2023 @12:09PM (#37274077)
Are you sure it's artificial and not related to yields? As in, it's more likely you get a dead pixel on a larger screen.

The answer would be "chiplets" of course, assembling bigger screens out of smaller ones. At the hobby leven, I think something decent could be built out of a few second hand kindle screens, if you plan the seams as part of the aesthetic.

Re:E-ink is so Retropunk by hwillis on Saturday August 26, 2023 @01:29PM (#37274900)
> As in, it's more likely you get a dead pixel on a larger screen.

Aside from the ink capsules and higher voltage (though still very low), E ink is almost identical to LCD and probably slightly easier to make. There's a TFT (which can have a larger footprint, since it doesn't need to be transparent) on the back, an LC or E ink capsule layer, and an ITO electrode. Dead pixels are almost always caused by damage or defects in the TFT.

I wouldn't say it's artificially out of reach, though- setting a line up to produce large panels is a high opportunity cost. If anything is artificial about it, it's that you presumably can't buy E ink capsules yourself. With enough effort you might be able to separate the top glass from an LCD TV, dissolve the LC, and replace it with E ink, but I have no idea how you'd do that. No promises it wouldn't burn out the TFT immediately.

Re:E-ink is so Retropunk by FirmwareBurner on Saturday August 26, 2023 @04:25PM (#37276552)
>E ink is almost identical to LCD and probably slightly easier to make

False. E-ink film, especially color, is definitely more complex to get right than LCDs.

Re:E-ink is so Retropunk by dredmorbius on Saturday August 26, 2023 @04:55PM (#37276830)
Acronym-expansion as a service:

TFT: Thin-film transistor

LC: Liquid crystal

ITO: Indium-tin oxide

LCD: Liquid crystal display (though this one's widely known).

Re:E-ink is so Retropunk by DemocracyFTW2 on Sunday August 27, 2023 @02:04AM (#37279840)
TINAPHHOHN [ti:nafo:n]

This Is Not A Popular Habit Here On HN

But it should be

YMMV

Re:E-ink is so Retropunk by dredmorbius on Sunday August 27, 2023 @05:58AM (#37281097)
You are NTHWNBTHWD.

(Not the hero we need, but the hero we deserve.)

Re:E-ink is so Retropunk by toyg on Sunday August 27, 2023 @08:34AM (#37282056)
If HN allowed bots, this would be a good bot to have.