I'm a fan as well. Their review process can be a bit opaque and sometimes feels like "5 of our people fucked around with these things for a week and here's what they think".

This would be a problem if there was any hint of bias, but (miraculously) there hasn't been so far.

I do wonder whether any of their (anonymous, AFAIK) reviewers have been personally corrupt, even if the organization may not be.