News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The first conformant M1 GPU driver by ohgodplsno on Tuesday August 22, 2023 @02:59PM (#37227097)
>I could live with not having iMessage

So, literally any messaging app, something that non-Apple users have to do anyways, and have to deal with your bullshit about only going through iMessage when they have to send you SMS.

>AirPlay

Chromecast is infinitely more ubiquitous. Also, if Apple didn't patent AirPlay and refuse to share it with anyone, you wouldn't be in this situation.

I will absolutely agree with Google being an absolutely dreadful steward of Android, but make no mistake: you gave Apple full support in locking themselves down in their own little playground, and now you're complaining you can't get out.

Re:The first conformant M1 GPU driver by sbuk on Tuesday August 22, 2023 @03:37PM (#37227557)
> Chromecast is infinitely more ubiquitous.

Chromecast is a device.

> Also, if Apple didn't patent AirPlay and refuse to share it with anyone, you wouldn't be in this situation.

Google Cast is just as proprietary as AirPlay. Both require licensing to be included in devices. I have an LG TV that supports both, an ancient Roku device that does the same, as well as supporting Miracast. You're confusing Chromecast and the Google Cast protocol with Miracast, which is an open standard; one dropped by Google in favour of their proprietary stack.

Re:The first conformant M1 GPU driver by kalleboo on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @03:14AM (#37232770)
> Chromecast is a device

It's branded as "Chromecast built-in" when supported by a TV, not "Google Cast".

e.g. https://www.sony.com/image/89821bf64399cd4c34680e0988903e4b?...

Re:The first conformant M1 GPU driver by sbuk on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @04:45AM (#37233359)
Is that a recent rebranding? The SDK is still called Google Cast.

https://developers.google.com/cast.

Re:The first conformant M1 GPU driver by kalleboo on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @05:04AM (#37233480)
It's probably a difference between developer facing and consumer facing, or software vs hardware branding.

Or maybe they just couldn't get a trademark for "Cast"?