News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:PHYS771 Lecture 9: Quantum – Scott Aaronson by sampo on Sunday August 20, 2023 @12:04PM (#37200415)
> For example, I've had experts in quantum field theory -- people who've spent years calculating path integrals of mind-boggling complexity -- ask me to explain the Bell inequality to them.

My favourite quantum mechanics textbook is Griffiths: Introduction to Quantum Mechanics. It is popular as a textbook for the first quantum mechanics course, which is typically in the second or third year of a physics curriculum. It has sections on EPR paradox and Bell's Theorem. First edition was published in 1994.

Re:PHYS771 Lecture 9: Quantum – Scott Aaronson by tux3 on Sunday August 20, 2023 @04:10PM (#37202534)
The cat book again! It seems everyone recommends Griffiths. I finally gave in and my copy should be arriving in a couple weeks.

I've looked through the Feynman lectures a bit, and although it's very nice for a free resource, it doesn't seem to be used very much at all in curriculums.

Re:PHYS771 Lecture 9: Quantum – Scott Aaronson by whimsicalism on Sunday August 20, 2023 @04:47PM (#37202800)
Feynman is not sufficient as a physics textbook.

Afaik the main games in town are Griffiths, Townsend, and Sakurai if you are a tryhard

iirc I prefer Sakurai & Townsends treatment over Griffiths but I might be misremembering

e: oh yes, i think griffiths intentionally avoids dirac notation which imo screws you later on down the line

Re:PHYS771 Lecture 9: Quantum – Scott Aaronson by bleepthrowaway on Sunday August 20, 2023 @07:08PM (#37203809)
Griffiths absolutely uses dirac notation.

Weinberg’s excellent (but not widely used!) quantum mechanics textbook does not, and being proficient in Weinberg’s text would not hinder anyone.

Re:PHYS771 Lecture 9: Quantum – Scott Aaronson by whimsicalism on Sunday August 20, 2023 @08:10PM (#37204153)
I think it just focuses heavily on wave mechanics and gets to dirac rather late

i like townsend because it’s like baby sakurai

Re:PHYS771 Lecture 9: Quantum – Scott Aaronson by bleepthrowaway on Sunday August 20, 2023 @08:37PM (#37204297)
Chapter 3 is Dirac formalism and its used for the remaining 9 chapters.

edit: I also like Sakurai, but I actually kind of like Weinberg’s non-dirac textbook better (I’ve only read the third edition)

Re:PHYS771 Lecture 9: Quantum – Scott Aaronson by 3abiton on Monday August 21, 2023 @12:09AM (#37205358)
So in terms of accessibility, Weinberg < Griffiths < Sakurai?
Re:PHYS771 Lecture 9: Quantum – Scott Aaronson by dustingetz on Sunday August 20, 2023 @05:03PM (#37202911)
what are the challengers? there are a few twitter scientists who have written QM textbooks that haven’t made their way into university curriculum yet
Re:PHYS771 Lecture 9: Quantum – Scott Aaronson by whimsicalism on Sunday August 20, 2023 @05:13PM (#37202984)
sakurai & townsend are the traditional challengers, when i was taking it i didn’t really think the modern challengers were up to snuff but that might have changed