Re:Analysis: Health care CEOs hauled in $4B last year as inf...
by endisneigh on Friday August 18, 2023 @10:16PM
(#37184809)
I’m confused by this comment - are you suggesting rent wouldn’t increase if there were fewer developer associated people around?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Analysis: Health care CEOs hauled in $4B last year as inf...
by klyrs on Friday August 18, 2023 @11:34PM
(#37185240)
>> You might opt out from voting and some nimby joins and whoops there is another huge development that doesn’t happen, meanwhile rent continues to increase.
I was directly replying to this accusation that I'm to blame for idly standing by whilst nimbys oppress the developers. I respond that none of that lines up with my local situation, and yet your boogeyman of rent increase is ever-present.
Re:Analysis: Health care CEOs hauled in $4B last year as inf...
by endisneigh on Friday August 18, 2023 @11:40PM
(#37185275)
By your own admission it seems there are few nimbys and plenty of development. Voting alone will not stop rent increasing. My point was there is a very particular class of issue that can be prevented.
Re:Analysis: Health care CEOs hauled in $4B last year as inf...
by klyrs on Saturday August 19, 2023 @04:21PM
(#37192759)
The phrase I responded to was
> ... [complaining] instead of just voting, which would solve most of their issues.
You presented "just voting" as a panacaea. You've retreated to the "[single] very particular class of issue" while sounding very triumphant that I'm the fool. Classic motte&bailey.
I don't know about where you live, but I've never had more than one to three opportunities to "just vote" per year. I spend the rest of the time "complaining."