News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dude,Where's My Donations? Wikimedia gives another $1M to... by wackget on Friday August 18, 2023 @03:18PM (#37180713)
FTA:

> As of December 31, 2021, the Endowment held $105.4 million. There is currently $99.33 million in the investment account and $6.07 million in cash. An additional $8 million raised in December will be transferred to the Endowment in January 2022.

Damn. Regardless of their questionable politically-motivated donations, I feel like they're being disingenuous when they plaster the "PLEASE DON'T IGNORE THIS" donation banners all over Wikipedia. Seems like they have tons and tons of cash.

Re:Dude,Where's My Donations? Wikimedia gives another $1M to... by MathMonkeyMan on Friday August 18, 2023 @04:33PM (#37181714)
I'm wondering if I'll ever see the day when somebody who asks me for money actually needs it.
Re:Dude,Where's My Donations? Wikimedia gives another $1M to... by sseagull on Friday August 18, 2023 @05:14PM (#37182199)
It’s like universities with billions already in their endowment fund. Whatever it is, it isn’t enough, and the fund better be bigger next year.

It’s the equivalent of individual people who never feel financially secure, even with millions in the bank.

Re:Dude,Where's My Donations? Wikimedia gives another $1M to... by m463 on Friday August 18, 2023 @10:19PM (#37184832)
Isn't that just life though? The people who ask for things are the ones who get them. Squeaky wheel gets the oil.
Re:Dude,Where's My Donations? Wikimedia gives another $1M to... by MathMonkeyMan on Friday August 18, 2023 @10:35PM (#37184924)
A squeaky wheel at least needs lubrication.

I'm not the judge of who "actually needs" money, but surely there are tons of people in the world (maybe in my neighborhood) who are struggling and would be helped by having some of my money. None of those people are asking me for change on the street or sending me donation letters. Disjoint sets.

Re:Dude,Where's My Donations? Wikimedia gives another $1M to... by LewisVerstappen on Friday August 18, 2023 @05:51PM (#37182639)
Frankly, wikipedia’s gotten significantly worse as a source of knowledge over the last few years as well.

Tons and tons of astroturfing & bias with articles.

There’s obviously tons of politicial bias but there’s also lots of individuals writing their own bias as a “uninterested third party” when in reality they’re emphasizing the narrative most favorable to them.

You see it a ton with wikipedia pages of entrepreneurs, journalists & obviously politicians.

Re:Dude,Where's My Donations? Wikimedia gives another $1M to... by newaccount74 on Friday August 18, 2023 @07:33PM (#37183556)
That has always been the case on Wikipedia. Some articles have editors watching over them who revert any edit that doesn't fit their narrative.
Re:Dude,Where's My Donations? Wikimedia gives another $1M to... by joker_minmax on Monday August 21, 2023 @12:09PM (#37211518)
I see this happening a lot more than it used to, though. Even if the edits are "I changed this quote because it's a fringe theory that misleads readers about what [article topic theory] represents", the edit will be reverted so that the misleading text remains, to serve a point.
Re:Dude,Where's My Donations? Wikimedia gives another $1M to... by FreshStart on Saturday August 19, 2023 @01:53AM (#37185937)
It turns out states and companies can donate full-time personal to subvert a open source foundation.
Re:Dude,Where's My Donations? Wikimedia gives another $1M to... by hulitu on Saturday August 19, 2023 @02:51AM (#37186225)
> also lots of individuals writing their own bias

and 3 letter agencies. Whenever a subject is a bit sensitive, you can feel their influence.