Re:The ancient technology keeping space missions alive
by ericbarrett on Friday August 18, 2023 @02:02PM
(#37179641)
COBOL is really quite straightforward and readable. I don't think a developer who's already familiar with a modern language or two would have a hard time picking it up. The system it's operating is domain-specific knowledge anyway, and would be something a newcomer would have to learn (or be familiar with) regardless of language.
Re:The ancient technology keeping space missions alive
by justinator on Saturday August 19, 2023 @04:27PM
(#37192802)
>I don't think a developer who's already familiar with a modern language or two would have a hard time picking it up.
You're probably correct, but it's more about if they would want to pick up a language that has no future, except maintenance of already existing systems. (see: Perl).
Re:The ancient technology keeping space missions alive
by JohnFen on Friday August 18, 2023 @05:14PM
(#37182202)
> Not everyone wants to learn COBOL to keep planes in the air and the IRS running
But there's excellent money in being a COBOL programmer. Some might be interested in that.
Re:The ancient technology keeping space missions alive
by deepspace on Friday August 18, 2023 @06:13PM
(#37182842)
The article calls software from the 90s "old". Nobody used COBOL for mission-critical software at that time. There is embedded software I wrote in the 80s and 90s still running in the field, mostly written in C.
Re:The ancient technology keeping space missions alive
by justinator on Saturday August 19, 2023 @04:26PM
(#37192796)
I didn't wrote that COBOL was used in aerospace, but used it as an example in different industries.
It's altogether amazing.