News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Microsoft AI suggests Ottawa food bank as a “cannot miss”... by PretzelPirate on Friday August 18, 2023 @09:08AM (#37175109)
It bothers me that the headline says this is the result of AI but the article says:

> The article is credited to "Microsoft Travel," and it is likely the product of a large language model (LLM)

Can journalists not investigate claims before writing articles on them?

Yes, it's probably LLM-generated, but it wouldn't have been hard to find out and have facts in hand in the article.

Re:Microsoft AI suggests Ottawa food bank as a “cannot miss”... by rdtsc on Friday August 18, 2023 @09:46AM (#37175547)
Just like some journalists don’t have time to check their sources others may actually write badly enough that it looks like AI wrote it.
Re:Microsoft AI suggests Ottawa food bank as a “cannot miss”... by reaperducer on Friday August 18, 2023 @10:33AM (#37176197)
Can journalists not investigate claims before writing articles on them?

They do. But this isn't journalism, it's Ars Technica; which is a great web site, but isn't any more "journalism" than Reddit.

Re:Microsoft AI suggests Ottawa food bank as a “cannot miss”... by beefpies on Friday August 18, 2023 @01:37PM (#37179252)
[delayed]