News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved the mystery. Parent comment

Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by jacquesm on Thursday August 17, 2023 @07:54AM (#37160234)
And Nature is still trying to whitewash its own reputation for publishing a very high visibility paper on superconduction that they had to retract.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by hilbert42 on Thursday August 17, 2023 @09:04AM (#37160941)
Right, thanks, I forgot about that.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by pasttense01 on Thursday August 17, 2023 @10:08AM (#37161813)
What paper was that?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved... by jacquesm on Thursday August 17, 2023 @10:30AM (#37162204)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05294-9
[ Parent | on HN ]