Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved...
by hilbert42 on Thursday August 17, 2023 @02:32AM
(#37157981)
Of course there's some sour grapes in Nature's article, as arxiv.org has had the best exposure it's likely to get in years. The more that publish there, the fewer who publish behind firewalls, etc. For starters, Nature's reprints are hellishly expensive.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved...
by pbmonster on Thursday August 17, 2023 @03:33AM
(#37158395)
> arxiv.org has had the best exposure it's likely to get in years. The more that publish there, the fewer who publish behind firewalls
We're talking about condensed matter physics here, arxiv needs zero exposure in this field. It is extremely common to publish on arxiv first and only then begin the process of submitting the same manuscript to be published (and peer reviewed) in a journal.
And while there are still some authors that skip over publishing pre-prints at all, there's no serious arxiv competitor if you do decide to publish pre-prints. It is a de-facto monopoly in this field.
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved...
by hilbert42 on Thursday August 17, 2023 @09:12AM
(#37161034)
True, but it's given the site more exposure in the general sense, it's now quoted by outlets that probably hadn't heard of it before this 'excitement'. (That can only help in the long run, one day Elbakyan mightn't need to do what she does.)
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved...
by jacquesm on Thursday August 17, 2023 @07:54AM
(#37160234)
And Nature is still trying to whitewash its own reputation for publishing a very high visibility paper on superconduction that they had to retract.
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved...
by hilbert42 on Thursday August 17, 2023 @09:04AM
(#37160941)
Right, thanks, I forgot about that.
Re:LK-99 isn’t a superconductor – how science sleuths solved...
by pasttense01 on Thursday August 17, 2023 @10:08AM
(#37161813)
What paper was that?