Re:Ask HN: If we train an LLM with “data” instead of “langua...
by croes on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @01:11PM
(#37150176)
But how do we communicate with an entity that understands data but not human language?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: If we train an LLM with “data” instead of “langua...
by arbuge on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @01:17PM
(#37150275)
It doesn't seem to me that that's a problem. You just put data in and expect data out.
For example, a weather continuation model could take in all the available weather data up to the present moment and provide a continuation of that, i.e. a weather forecast.
Likewise financial market predictions etc.
Re:Ask HN: If we train an LLM with “data” instead of “langua...
by BreadPants on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @01:30PM
(#37150516)
How about a multi-headed approach. LDMs specializing in certain data operating under one LLM that acts as our point of access?
Re:Ask HN: If we train an LLM with “data” instead of “langua...
by MichaelZuo on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @01:24PM
(#37150414)
That's a good point, Math is just as much a communicable language as English, French, Japanese, etc... maybe even more so according to some formal definitions.
Re:Ask HN: If we train an LLM with “data” instead of “langua...
by T-A on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @02:08PM
(#37151168)
> a weather continuation model could take in all the available weather data up to the present moment and provide a continuation of that
And it turns out to work really well:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.12794
predicts hundreds of weather variables, over 10 days at 0.25 degree resolution globally, in under one minute
Re:Ask HN: If we train an LLM with “data” instead of “langua...
by optimalsolver on Wednesday August 16, 2023 @01:29PM
(#37150500)
Send it a sequence of raw UTF bytes and see what it replies with.