Re:Opendream: A Non-Destructive UI for Stable Diffusion
by stale2002 on Tuesday August 15, 2023 @03:31PM
(#37138261)
I would say that it absolutely deserved to be flagged because it was a comment of little engagement.
It both isn't directly related to the original post, and also didn't even make any particular arguments. It was just a 5 word declaration of fact, that is borderline offtopic.
Re:Opendream: A Non-Destructive UI for Stable Diffusion
by cercatrova on Tuesday August 15, 2023 @06:35PM
(#37140168)
Flagged because it was an unsubstantive comment as dang mentioned and also that it's increasingly a flame bait topic on HN, same as with Copilot and licensing.
Re:Opendream: A Non-Destructive UI for Stable Diffusion
by __loam on Tuesday August 15, 2023 @07:01PM
(#37140421)
Downvotes because the userbase here is rabidly supportive of any new "AI" tech regardless of the consequences, damage, or ethics surrounding it. But of course, we can never take a critical view of technology on Hackernews.
Downvotes because you didn't back up what you mean.
Flagged because there are AI fanboys that want to sensor speech perhaps?