Re:Opendream: A Non-Destructive UI for Stable Diffusion
by valine on Tuesday August 15, 2023 @03:11PM
(#37137987)
Theft takes the original, piracy makes a copy, AI art remixes the original. I’m not sure how to classify AI art but it definitely isn’t theft.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Opendream: A Non-Destructive UI for Stable Diffusion
by slowmovintarget on Tuesday August 15, 2023 @03:22PM
(#37138151)
So piracy may be involved in training the model, but the rest does not follow.
Art inspired by other art has been the way of things for as long as we've been creating images. There's no such thing as a "clean-room painting."
Re:Opendream: A Non-Destructive UI for Stable Diffusion
by __loam on Tuesday August 15, 2023 @06:54PM
(#37140355)
Using unlicensed copies of other people's work in training is the problem, along with what that does to the market for original works. Using people's labor for AI training without permission or compensation will discourage people from sharing that work and ultimately make the AI models worse too.
Re:Opendream: A Non-Destructive UI for Stable Diffusion
by yieldcrv on Tuesday August 15, 2023 @03:27PM
(#37138221)
Derivative works with zero copyright protection due to the predominance of machine assists
No way to quantify though, for or against copy protection
But thats a convenient compromise for now