News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The world in which IPv6 was a good design by ianburrell on Monday August 14, 2023 @01:10PM (#37123590)
I think major failure of Kubernetes was not being IPv6-only from the beginning. Its model of every pod having own address works much better with IPv6 where addresses are cheap. With IPv4, it needs complicated overlay networks. The cluster boundary would also make a good place for NAT64 proxy.

Kubernetes didn't get IPv6 support until later, and it sounds like it isn't reliable yet.

Re:The world in which IPv6 was a good design by mike_d on Monday August 14, 2023 @07:01PM (#37127891)
> I think major failure of Kubernetes was

Heh. Kubernetes as a whole was a failed project at Google that got open sourced.

Re:The world in which IPv6 was a good design by pknomad on Tuesday August 15, 2023 @07:08AM (#37132455)
I was under the impression that Google simply latched onto the project? Doesn't Google still use borg to this day?