Why? If software authors don't understand that releasing their code under an open source license means someone else other than them may potentially benefit from it, that's really on them.

Predatory unethical open source freeloaders don’t.

Amazon has never offered a database service based on the MongoDB server software. Not when it was AGPLv3 nor when it was SSPLv1.

It implemented a wire protocol for interoperability purposes, similar to functionality in IBM DB2, Azure CosmosDB, FerretDB, and other databases.

If you're using Terraform to manage deployments in test and development it's still business as usual, but if you're actively using them in production or making a company that sells a wrapper around Terraform then you'd have to pay Hashicorp.

Honestly it's pretty fair. I can continue to make my own personal, test, or development apps using vault, consul, and terraform.

And this move was done because plenty of large companies (not naming names because this is starting to touch a legal gray area) are using Vault and Consul in production to generate hundreds of millions to billions a year in revenue.

> All non-production uses are permitted. All production uses are allowed other than hosting or embedding the software in an offering competitive with HashiCorp products or services.

Competition is healthy. Everyone should be reluctant to lock himself in with a vendor seeking a monopoly.