Ignorance. You can only solve problems that you see and with my conspiratorial hat on, i would say it is deliberate.

What is the ignorance you’re seeing here?

In case of this article:

> Mr Sudarskis argues that the most vulnerable parties are not the investors, who recieve a share of the fees and willingly sign a contract with their fund managers, _but portfolio companies._

In terms of effected people, i would not call investors the "most vulnerable". Have-nots can't spread risk to the degree a fund manager can and are bound much more to local monopolies.

Sorry I’m still not following. What’s weird about that? Sounds like you’re trying to imply something but I’m not getting it.