Re:HashiCorp Adopts Business Source License
by pessimizer on Thursday August 10, 2023 @05:44PM
(#37082189)
No, if words have meaning, "closed source" does not provide source. Closed source does not mean "not open source."
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:HashiCorp Adopts Business Source License
by falcolas on Thursday August 10, 2023 @07:01PM
(#37082817)
Well then, according to the meaning you are assigning these words, Windows must be open source.
Which, of course, is obviously false. Which means the words have different meaning than what you ascribe to them.
Source available means you can view the source code, by abiding to the terms the owner of the code sets.
Closed source means you can’t change or redistribute that source, regardless of whether you are allowed to view it.
Re:HashiCorp Adopts Business Source License
by pseudalopex on Thursday August 10, 2023 @07:49PM
(#37083248)
Windows would be not open source and not closed source according to them. I think most people would call it closed source however.
Re:HashiCorp Adopts Business Source License
by rcme on Thursday August 10, 2023 @08:27PM
(#37083556)
It’s obviously a spectrum, but (some) people think of different things when they hear “closed source” vs. “source available”. Also, a company like Microsoft providing source to big customers doesn’t make their products source available, at least not in the commonly understood way. Source available usually means the source is freely available for reading. That obviously does not apply to Windows.
The windows source is not avalible to _me_, even if they show it to some people. It is useful to have a term for source available to everyone.
Re:HashiCorp Adopts Business Source License
by CrimsonRain on Friday August 11, 2023 @05:00AM
(#37086579)
So where can I view windows 11 source code? Got a link?